Re: Oracle / PostgreSQL comparison...

From: "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
To: "Stephen Frost *EXTERN*" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Rodrigo E(dot) De León Plicet <rdeleonp(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Oracle / PostgreSQL comparison...
Date: 2011-06-24 07:22:34
Message-ID: D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C20694A4EC@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Stephen Frost wrote:
> I love how he finishes with the claim that Oracle "keep their finger on
> the pulse of where IT is headed", right after admitting that their
> client is actually a huge piece of junk.

I guess that was just a typo.
Shouldn't it read "[Oracle can] keep their fingers on the throat of where IT is headed"?

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2011-06-24 07:25:42 Re: Oracle / PostgreSQL comparison...
Previous Message Rob Sargent 2011-06-24 06:42:42 Re: Relative path specified for data_directory is not working as expected