| From: | "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane *EXTERN*" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Michael Meskes" <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Boszormenyi Zoltan" <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Subject: | Re: Split-up ECPG patches |
| Date: | 2009-08-10 06:54:37 |
| Message-ID: | D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C203937EAF@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>>> So I'd like to see an actual case made
>>> that there's a strong reason for not requiring FROM/IN in ecpg.
>>
>> I guess there's only one, compatibility.
>
> Yeah. Are there any other precompilers that actively reject FROM/IN
> here? If we're just a bit more strict than they are, it's not as bad
> as if there is no common syntax subset.
Oracle:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/appdev.111/b28427/pc_afemb.htm#i9340
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2009-08-10 07:04:54 | Re: mixed, named notation support |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-08-10 06:45:22 | Re: [PATCH] 2PC state files on shared memory |