Re: implemented missing bitSetBit() and bitGetBit()

From: "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
To: "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "David Helgason" <david(at)uti(dot)is>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: implemented missing bitSetBit() and bitGetBit()
Date: 2004-02-04 19:36:33
Message-ID: D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B8294CE619@voyager.corporate.connx.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bit sets are remarkably useful functionality. I suggest putting it
into the core product.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neil Conway [mailto:neilc(at)samurai(dot)com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 11:22 AM
> To: David Helgason
> Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] implemented missing bitSetBit() and bitGetBit()
>
>
> David Helgason <david(at)uti(dot)is> writes:
> > I needed these, so I went and implemented them myself.
>
> I didn't see any followup to this: do we want to include this
> in the main tree, contrib/, or not at all?
>
> -Neil (who has no opinion on the matter, but just wants to
> make sure this doesn't fall through the cracks)
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-02-04 19:51:33 Re: implemented missing bitSetBit() and bitGetBit()
Previous Message Neil Conway 2004-02-04 19:22:05 Re: implemented missing bitSetBit() and bitGetBit()