Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

From: "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
To: "ow" <oneway_111(at)yahoo(dot)com>, "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, "Greg Stark" <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Date: 2003-11-18 19:31:48
Message-ID: D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B8294CE39A@voyager.corporate.connx.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ow [mailto:oneway_111(at)yahoo(dot)com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 11:23 AM
> To: Dann Corbit; Christopher Kings-Lynne; Greg Stark
> Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
>
>
>
> --- Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> wrote:
> > I have all of the above database systems installed on the
> Windows 2000
> > machine I am typing this message from. DB/2 7.1
> > Oracle 8.1.7 and 9.2.0.5
> > MySQL 4.0.12
> > Sybase Adaptive Server 12.0
> > Informix Dynamic Server 9.2
> > (Also SapDB, Firebird server, SQL*Server, and several
> others that are
> > not running right now)
>
> I'd say your environment is somewhat unique.

No argument there.

> > A typical window-phobic.
>
> Not really. I simply think there are more pressing issues
> than win32 port.
>
> Peace

I suppose I get rabid about it because I will benefit in a stupendous
way when it becomes available. Hence, I see that area of development
from different colored lenses than you do.

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Rogers 2003-11-18 19:33:59 Sponsoring enterprise features
Previous Message ow 2003-11-18 19:22:42 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?