Re: Two weeks to feature freeze

From: "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
To: "Jan Wieck" <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jason Earl" <jason(dot)earl(at)simplot(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
Date: 2003-06-24 05:34:47
Message-ID: D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B8294CDE0E@voyager.corporate.connx.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Wieck [mailto:JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com]
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 10:30 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: scott.marlowe; Bruce Momjian; Tom Lane; Jason Earl;
> PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Two weeks to feature freeze
[snip]
> I personally think you don't actually ever did any software testing
> yourself. You are not really talking from experience, are you? So
> please, show me what you have now, or get one more plus on my
> minus-list.

I have already posted enough information to show my qualitications.

Whether I am qualified or not is irrelevant to whether the argument has
merit or not.

I have raised what I consider to be an important issue.

Astute members of the list have noticed that I have not volunteered to
perform the work. I may or may not produce some efforts towards testing
PostgreSQL. Whether I decide to help or not is irrelevant towards the
concept of what needs to be done.

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2003-06-24 05:50:21 Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
Previous Message Dann Corbit 2003-06-24 05:31:33 Re: Two weeks to feature freeze