Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_table_ddl() to reconstruct CREATE TABLE statements

From: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Akshay Joshi <akshay(dot)joshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_table_ddl() to reconstruct CREATE TABLE statements
Date: 2026-06-22 14:00:20
Message-ID: D7068A62-6A30-44B9-BADD-0FFACEAD110A@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Jun 22, 2026, at 20:40, Akshay Joshi <akshay(dot)joshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> You're right, and thanks for spotting this. The existing pattern in pg_proc.dat for variadic-text functions (e.g., jsonb_delete, json_extract_path) uses _text at the variadic position in both proargtypes and proallargtypes, with provariadic => 'text'. That is the convention documented by the sanity check in src/test/regress/sql/opr_sanity.sql.
>
> The same issue applies to pg_get_role_ddl, pg_get_tablespace_ddl (both variants), and pg_get_database_ddl, but that will require a separate patch.
>

Thanks for confirming. Then I will file a patch tomorrow to fix those.

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Akshay Joshi 2026-06-22 14:11:18 Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_table_ddl() to reconstruct CREATE TABLE statements
Previous Message Robert Haas 2026-06-22 13:50:52 Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query