Re: 8.1 count(*) distinct: IndexScan/SeqScan

From: Pailloncy Jean-Gerard <jg(at)rilk(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: andrew(at)pillette(dot)com
Subject: Re: 8.1 count(*) distinct: IndexScan/SeqScan
Date: 2005-11-24 11:54:25
Message-ID: D629E6A4-81A4-42F0-9702-68883971F05E@rilk.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

> THIS MAY SEEM SILLY but vacuum is mispelled below and presumably
> there was never any ANALYZE done.
>
>>
>> postgres=# vaccum full verbose analyze;
I do have done the "vacUUm full verbose analyze;".
But I copy/paste the wrong line.

Cordialement,
Jean-Gérard Pailloncy

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pailloncy Jean-Gerard 2005-11-24 11:54:50 Re: 8.1 count(*) distinct: IndexScan/SeqScan
Previous Message Sven Geisler 2005-11-24 10:38:47 Re: High context switches occurring