| From: | "Marshall Spight" <mspight(at)dnai(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL |
| Date: | 2003-10-23 08:13:23 |
| Message-ID: | D4Mlb.2359$9E1.17769@attbi_s52 |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Anthony W. Youngman" <thewolery(at)nospam(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk> wrote in message news:UGXSKIAGbtk$EwW3(at)thewolery(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk(dot)(dot)(dot)
>
> As soon as a requirement for a database specifies extraction of the
> maximum power from the box,
I don't for a second believe that this is your only requirement,
or that this is even an actual requirement. If it really is an
actual requirement, then I assume you're writing all of your
code in hand-tuned assembly language, and that the document
you consult most regularly when writing code is the CPU's
instruction timing table.
Another commodity box costs $1000, which is about the
same as the cost to a company of a day's programmer time.
What *really* matters is getting software delivered in a timely
fashion, that is as correct as possible, and that will operate
reliably over time and not cause data corruption.
Marshall
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marshall Spight | 2003-10-23 08:26:58 | Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL |
| Previous Message | Tommi Maekitalo | 2003-10-23 08:08:53 | Re: Last beta ... we hope? |