Re: Parallelize WAL Sender and WAL receiver

From: Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)elevated-dev(dot)com>
To: ajit wangkhem <ajit(dot)wangkhem(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallelize WAL Sender and WAL receiver
Date: 2024-09-05 12:08:36
Message-ID: D4E8216E-B9A9-4997-93BE-EC8030706DC2@elevated-dev.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

> On Sep 5, 2024, at 1:54 AM, ajit wangkhem <ajit(dot)wangkhem(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> If speed create problem than make 3 easy script. 1. compress wal_archive. 2. ship wal archive over network and than 3. in the secondary server just decompress it.

I'm guessing you've never benchmarked your compression? With 10GbE, the CPU overhead of compression will just slow it down.

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Johnson 2024-09-05 13:00:17 Re: pg_basebackup: error: could not create directory
Previous Message ajit wangkhem 2024-09-05 07:54:48 Re: Parallelize WAL Sender and WAL receiver