From: | "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] insert performance for win32 |
Date: | 2005-11-04 18:41:28 |
Message-ID: | D425483C2C5C9F49B5B7A41F8944154757D281@postal.corporate.connx.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-
> owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Magnus Hagander
> Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 10:31 AM
> To: Tom Lane; Merlin Moncure
> Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org; pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PERFORM] insert performance for win32
>
> > >> AFAICS it is appropriate to move the sigsetjmp and
> > >> setup_cancel_handler calls in front of the per-line loop inside
> > >> MainLoop --- can anyone see a reason not to?
> >
> > > hm. mainloop is re-entrant, right? That means each \i
> > would reset the
> > > handler...what is downside to keeping global flag?
> >
> > Ah, right, and in fact I'd missed the comment at line 325
> > pointing out that we're relying on the sigsetjmp to be
> > re-executed every time through. That could be improved on,
> > likely, but not right before a release.
> >
> > Does the flag need to be global? I'm thinking
How about:
void
setup_cancel_handler(void)
{
+ static bool done = false;
+
+ if (!done)
+ {
SetConsoleCtrlHandler(consoleHandler, TRUE);
+ done = true;
+ }
}
> Seems like a simple enough solution, don't see why it shouldn't work.
As
> long as psql is single-threaded, which it is...
> (Actually, that code seems to re-set done=true on every call which
seems
> unnecessary - but that might be optimised away, I guess)
>
> //Magnus
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-11-04 18:54:04 | Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-11-04 18:37:32 | Re: insert performance for win32 |