Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?

From: "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
To: <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Jeffrey W(dot) Baker" <jwbaker(at)acm(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?
Date: 2005-09-29 18:32:12
Message-ID: D425483C2C5C9F49B5B7A41F8944154757D124@postal.corporate.connx.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

If I were to be nosy and poke around in this, what patches of code would
I be interested in?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-
> owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Josh Berkus
> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 11:28 AM
> To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Cc: Jeffrey W. Baker
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?
>
> Jeff,
>
> > I would just run it under the profiler and see how many times
> > beginmerge() is called.
>
> Hmm, I'm not seeing it at all in the oprofile results on a
100million-row
> sort.
>
> --
> --Josh
>
> Josh Berkus
> Aglio Database Solutions
> San Francisco
>
> ---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2005-09-29 20:03:39 Re: Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2005-09-29 18:27:56 Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?