Re: Docs: Standardize "cannot" usage in SGML source

From: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Docs: Standardize "cannot" usage in SGML source
Date: 2025-12-24 23:37:54
Message-ID: D32D919A-77C6-45EE-B6D5-37654A9DE871@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Dec 25, 2025, at 04:12, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 06:00:20PM +0800, Chao Li wrote:
>> Hi Hacker,
>>
>> While reviewing a patch, I happened to notice the PG docs prefer “cannot” than
>> “can not”.
>>
>> Under doc/src/sgml, if we count:
>> ```
>> sgml % grep -r "cannot" . | wc -l
>> 818
>> ```
>>
>> “Cannot” has 818 occurrences, but “can not” has only 3:
>
> Looks good, patch applied.
>

Thanks a lot for pushing.

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-12-24 23:42:04 Re: Switch buffile.c/h to use pgoff_t
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2025-12-24 22:01:16 Re: psql: Fix tab completion for VACUUM option values