Re: Support for BDR in 9.5?

From: "Andrew Biggs (adb)" <adb(at)cisco(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Support for BDR in 9.5?
Date: 2016-01-08 19:54:35
Message-ID: D2B561D3.DA9E%adb@cisco.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 1/8/16, 12:51 PM, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com<mailto:simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>> wrote:

On 8 January 2016 at 18:56, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com<mailto:jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>> wrote:
On 01/08/2016 10:42 AM, Andrew Biggs (adb) wrote:

Installed 9.5 to CentOS7 via yum, and tried going through the BDR
quick-start guide (minus sections 2.1):

http://bdr-project.org/docs/stable/quickstart.html

It was unhappy that BDR binaries were not on the path, and failed at
section 2.4.

Then went back and tried installing the BDR patch (section 2.1) which
finished with this unhappy message:

configure: error: bdr is not compatible with postgres 9.5

I was just curious if others have had success with this.

Although many of the components of BDR are in 9.5, BDR itself is still currently a fork. It can be downloaded from 2ndQuadrant. In theory it will be available in 9.6.

BDR 9.4 is currently at v0.9.3. There isn't a BDR 9.5, since we concentrated on pglogical.

pglogical works with 9.4 and 9.5 and is currently at v1.0

Future detailed planning for BDR and pglogical is happening now; there definitely will be future versions with increasing PostgreSQL compatibility.

Got it. Thanks guys, very much appreciated!

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karsten Hilbert 2016-01-08 20:46:39 Re: pg_upgrade 9.4 -> 9.5 with pg_trgm fails for me
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2016-01-08 19:51:41 Re: Support for BDR in 9.5?