Re: pg_upgrade from 9.3 to 9.4 fails

On 10/5/15, 2:02 PM, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

>On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 06:00:27PM +0000, Guo, Yun wrote:
>> >Wow, that is weird. Can you run this query on the old cluster and show
>> >us the output?
>> >
>> > SELECT * FROM pg_type WHERE oid = 1670699;
>>
>> This turns out to be empty in all of the databases:
>> postgres=# SELECT * FROM pg_type WHERE oid = 1670699;
>> typname | typnamespace | typowner | typlen | typbyval | typtype |
>> typcategory | typispreferred | typisdefined | typdelim | typrelid | typ
>> elem | typarray | typinput | typoutput | typreceive | typsend |
>>typmodin |
>> typmodout | typanalyze | typalign | typstorage | typnotnull | t
>> ypbasetype | typtypmod | typndims | typcollation | typdefaultbin |
>> typdefault | typacl
>>
>>---------+--------------+----------+--------+----------+---------+-------
>>--
>> ----+----------------+--------------+----------+----------+----
>>
>>-----+----------+----------+-----------+------------+---------+----------
>>+-
>> ----------+------------+----------+------------+------------+--
>>
>>-----------+-----------+----------+--------------+---------------+-------
>>--
>> ---+--------
>> (0 rows)
>
>OK, try running the error query in all the databases then.

I tried it all databases. None of them has oid 1670699 in pg_type.

>
>> >This query doesn't even query pg_type, so it must be some internal use
>> >of pg_type.
>> >
>> >The reason check doesn't show the failure is that only a non-check run
>> >collects pg_class.oid values, but we never expect that to fail so we
>> >don't test it in check mode.
>> >
>> >My guess is that something is messed up in your system catalogs. Can
>> >you try running this query in each old database and see if it fails.
>>
>> If my old server system catalog is messed up is there way to repair it?
>
>Usually, once we find the cause.
>
>--
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
> EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
>
>+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
>+ Roman grave inscription +