Re: Planner question - "bit" data types

> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Karl Denninger
> Enviado el: Sábado, 05 de Septiembre de 2009 21:19
> Para: Alvaro Herrera
> CC: Tom Lane; Merlin Moncure; Josh Berkus;
> pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Asunto: Re: [PERFORM] Planner question - "bit" data types
>
> There was a previous thread and I referenced it. I don't have
> the other one in my email system any more to follow up to it.
>
> I give up; the attack-dog crowd has successfully driven me off. Ciao.
>
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> Karl Denninger escribió:
>
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> You never showed us any EXPLAIN results,
>
>
> Yes I did. Go back and look at the archives.
> I provided full EXPLAIN
> and EXPLAIN ANALYZE results for the original
> query. Sheesh.
>
>
>
> You did? Where? This is your first message in this thread:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2009-09/msg00059.php
> No EXPLAINs anywhere to be seen.
>

I guess this is the post Karl refers to:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-sql/2009-08/msg00088.php

Still you can't hope that others will recall a post 2 weeks ago, with an
other subject and in an other list!