Re: deductive databases in postgreSQL

From: decibel <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
Cc: Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas <carlos(at)gonzalez(dot)name>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: deductive databases in postgreSQL
Date: 2009-01-22 18:16:36
Message-ID: D13488C4-B21E-48FC-A52F-CC223BB1C5FA@decibel.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Jan 22, 2009, at 8:24 AM, Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
> No one that I know of. Well, it is a long road. The addition of a
> data type
> xml is recent (8.3). We lack a set of features like indexing, a new
> data
> structure (?), XQuery, XPath improvement and, so on [1]. Don't
> expect much of
> these TODO items completed before the next two releases (unless you
> want to
> take a stab).

You could also possibly pay a consulting company to implement it, but
even that isn't as easy as it may sound. :)
--
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefan Murphy 2009-01-22 19:01:10 can't duplicate an error in a restored DB
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2009-01-22 18:14:06 Re: difference between current_timestamp and now() in quotes

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message decibel 2009-01-22 18:16:39 Re: problem with archive_command as suggested by documentation
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2009-01-22 18:11:17 Re: Pluggable Indexes (was Re: rmgr hooks (v2))