Re: 007_pre_auth.pl fails if injection_points_wakeup hits unintended process

From: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 007_pre_auth.pl fails if injection_points_wakeup hits unintended process
Date: 2026-11-02 07:36:42
Message-ID: D118FA19-5FA6-4E4C-9C6C-FE87E85B90F3@yandex-team.ru
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 2 Nov 2026, at 11:08, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the report. I am planning to tackle this one with the
> following tweak to the test's conf:
> autovacuum = off
> max_logical_replication_workers = 0
>
> Does that work for you?

I think it's fine. But when we will have new bgworker hitting this point we might
need to change this test again.

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2026-11-02 07:38:13 Re: Reject access to unlogged tables in contrib modules
Previous Message Bertrand Drouvot 2026-11-02 07:18:00 Re: [PATCH] pgstat: Add helper to drop entries from a stats kind's hash