From: | "Ratay, Steve" <Steve(dot)Ratay(at)Teradata(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Unable to build pg_rewind |
Date: | 2015-02-26 02:34:25 |
Message-ID: | D113F02A.74221%steve.ratay@teradata.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thanks all. I opened an issue in GitHub (https://github.com/vmware/pg_rewind/issues/43) Sorry for posting to the wrong spot. I found some discussions on pg_rewind on this list, so I thought it was the appropriate place to send my questions.
Thanks, Steve
From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com<mailto:michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>>
Date: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 at 6:47 PM
To: Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz<mailto:mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>>
Cc: Steven Ratay <steve(dot)ratay(at)teradata(dot)com<mailto:steve(dot)ratay(at)teradata(dot)com>>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org<mailto:pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org<mailto:pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Unable to build pg_rewind
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz<mailto:mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>> wrote:
On 25/02/15 11:06, Ratay, Steve wrote:
I have checked out the pg_rewind code from https://github.com/vmware/pg_rewind.git on the master branch and am using PostgreSQL 9.4.1 source code to build against. When I try to compile pg_rewind, I am getting the following errors. How can I resolve these problems?
It looks like master of pg_rewind expects to be built against Postgres 9.5. Try checking out the REL9_4_STABLE branch.
This branching model makes management of the code easier because WAL-related APIs and WAL format can change a lot between major releases (and also because in this case it would have made the code less readable using blocks based on PG_VERSION_NUM for not that much result).
Note as well that pg_rewind is not (yet?) added in PostgreSQL core, so you should ask directly questions here:
https://github.com/vmware/pg_rewind/issues
Regards,
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-02-26 02:38:42 | Re: Odd behavior of updatable security barrier views on foreign tables |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2015-02-26 01:57:38 | Re: Partitioning WIP patch |