RE: idle-in-transaction timeout error does not give a hint

From: "Jamison, Kirk" <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Michael Paquier' <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "Ideriha, Takeshi" <ideriha(dot)takeshi(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: 'Tatsuo Ishii' <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: idle-in-transaction timeout error does not give a hint
Date: 2019-02-15 01:15:17
Message-ID: D09B13F772D2274BB348A310EE3027C643A6AC@g01jpexmbkw24
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Monday, February 4, 2019 2:15 AM +0000, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 04:07:34AM +0000, Ideriha, Takeshi wrote:
> > Sure. I didn't have a strong opinion about it, so it's ok.

> From what I can see this is waiting input from a native English speaker, so for now I have moved this entry to next CF.

Although I also use English in daily life,
I am not from a native English-speaking country.
But I'm giving it a try, since the current patch is not that complex to check.

> HINT: In a moment you should be able to reconnect to the
> database and restart your transaction.

I think this error hint message makes sense for idle-in-transaction timeout.
It's grammatically correct and gives a clearer hint for that.

I agree that "reconnect to database" implies "restart session",
so it may not be the best word for errhint message.

Now the next point raised by Ideriha-san is whether the
other places in the code should also be changed.

I also checked the source code where the other errhints appear,
besides idle-in-transaction.

Those errcodes use "repeat your command" for the hint.
> errhint("In a moment you should be able to reconnect to the"
> " database and repeat your command.")));

As per its errdetail, the transaction is rollbacked,
so "restart transaction" also makes sense.

The second one is under the clause below...
> if (RecoveryConflictPending && DoingCommandRead) using "repeat your command" makes sense.

I'm fine with retaining the other two hint messages as they are.
Regardless if we want to change the other similarly written
errhint messages or add errhint messages for other errcodes
that don't have it, I think the latest patch that provides errhint
message for idle-in-transaction timeout may be changed to
"Ready for Committer", as it still applies and the tests
successfully passed.

Kirk Jamison

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2019-02-15 01:15:38 Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2019-02-15 00:24:15 Re: pg_basebackup ignores the existing data directory permissions