Re: controlling meson's parallelism (and some whining)

From: "Tristan Partin" <tristan(at)neon(dot)tech>
To: "Tristan Partin" <tristan(at)neon(dot)tech>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: controlling meson's parallelism (and some whining)
Date: 2023-10-20 17:08:19
Message-ID: CWDFK928S8WO.L157WRJXCT1J@neon.tech
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri Oct 20, 2023 at 11:22 AM CDT, Tristan Partin wrote:
> On Thu Oct 19, 2023 at 12:44 PM CDT, Robert Haas wrote:
> > The obvious fix to this is to just tell 'meson test' how many
> > processes I'd like it to run. I thought maybe I could just do 'meson
> > -j8 test' but that does not work, because the option is
> > --num-processes and has no short version. Even typing -j8 every time
> > would be kind of annoying; typing --num-processes 8 every time is
> > ridiculously verbose.
>
> I submitted a patch[0] to Meson to add -j.
>
> [0]: https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/pull/12403

You will see this in the 1.3.0 release which will be happening soon™️.

--
Tristan Partin
Neon (https://neon.tech)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-10-20 19:31:15 Re: Remove last traces of HPPA support
Previous Message Bharath Rupireddy 2023-10-20 16:49:32 Re: Improve WALRead() to suck data directly from WAL buffers when possible