| From: | "Tristan Partin" <tristan(at)neon(dot)tech> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joe Conway" <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | <gdo(at)leader(dot)it>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #17946: LC_MONETARY & DO LANGUAGE plperl - BUG |
| Date: | 2023-07-03 16:25:31 |
| Message-ID: | CTSOE3SS70RW.YE7NMLMQSQSO@gonk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Sat Jun 24, 2023 at 8:09 AM CDT, Joe Conway wrote:
> Although I have not looked yet, presumably we could have similar
> problems with plpython. I would like to get agreement on this approach
> against plperl before diving into that though.
>
> Thoughts?
I don't see anything immediately wrong with this. I think doing a
similar thing for plpython would make sense. Might make sense to CC any
other pl* maintainers too.
--
Tristan Partin
Neon (https://neon.tech)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2023-07-03 16:28:01 | Re: BUG #17946: LC_MONETARY & DO LANGUAGE plperl - BUG |
| Previous Message | Tristan Partin | 2023-07-03 16:17:21 | Re: BUG #17946: LC_MONETARY & DO LANGUAGE plperl - BUG |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2023-07-03 16:28:01 | Re: BUG #17946: LC_MONETARY & DO LANGUAGE plperl - BUG |
| Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2023-07-03 16:18:38 | Re: Proposal: %T Prompt parameter for psql for current time (like Oracle has) |