Re: Meson build updates

From: "Tristan Partin" <tristan(at)neon(dot)tech>
To: "Andres Freund" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Meson build updates
Date: 2023-06-29 19:17:30
Message-ID: CTPDJLWBJV4V.1O65TIXTC8STQ@gonk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu Jun 29, 2023 at 2:13 PM CDT, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2023-06-29 14:07:19 -0500, Tristan Partin wrote:
> > I still think the overrides are important, at the very least for libpq,
> > but I will defer to your aforementioned decision for now.
>
> libpq makes sense to me, fwiw. Just doing it for all binaries individually
> didn't seem as obviously beneficial.
>
> FWIW, it seems it could be handled somewhat centrally for binaries, the
> bin_targets array should have all that's needed?

I will send a follow-up patch with at least libpq overridden. I will
investigate the bin_targets.

> Some things won't work from the build directory, btw. E.g. initdb or postgres
> itself.

I have already fallen victim to this! Lesson learned :).

--
Tristan Partin
Neon (https://neon.tech)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan S. Katz 2023-06-29 19:51:10 Re: plan_create_index_workers doesn't account for TOAST
Previous Message Tristen Raab 2023-06-29 19:16:52 Re: pg_waldump: add test for coverage