RE: New Window Function: ROW_NUMBER_DESC() OVER() ?

From: Maiquel Grassi <grassi(at)hotmail(dot)com(dot)br>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: New Window Function: ROW_NUMBER_DESC() OVER() ?
Date: 2024-01-16 21:58:15
Message-ID: CP8P284MB2496A36F534D030C64BD1127EC732@CP8P284MB2496.BRAP284.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

The people in this community are quite capable and willing to write a contrary opinion to mine. Not sure how to make “this new proposed function shouldn’t be added to core”, and trying to explain why not, non-oppressive. I can add “thank you for taking the time to try and improve PostgreSQL” in front to soften the blow of rejection but I tend to just get to the point.

David J.

----//----

Thank you for your opinion. We built together one more insight on PostgreSQL for the community.

Best regards,
Maiquel O.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2024-01-16 21:58:42 Re: index prefetching
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-01-16 21:46:09 Re: [PATCH] Add support function for containment operators