| From: | Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Arseny Sher <a(dot)sher(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Global snapshots |
| Date: | 2019-04-21 17:13:21 |
| Message-ID: | CEB5C3A6-3CD1-404B-A827-12B6A87D8804@yandex-team.ru |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi!
> 30 нояб. 2018 г., в 18:00, Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> написал(а):
>
>
> <0001-GlobalCSNLog-SLRU-v3.patch><0002-Global-snapshots-v3.patch><0003-postgres_fdw-support-for-global-snapshots-v3.patch>
In spite of recent backup discussions I realized that we need to backup clusters even if they provide global snapshot capabilities.
I think we can have pretty elegant Point-in-CSN-Recovery here, right? If we want a group of clusters to recover to a globally consistent state.
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2019-04-21 17:22:20 | Re: Do PostgreSQL have map and set structure(like STL in C++)? |
| Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2019-04-21 16:59:03 | Re: [HACKERS] Weaker shmem interlock w/o postmaster.pid |