> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Bill Harris
> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 9:50 PM
> To: Marc G. Fournier
> Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] [ANNOUNCE] USENET vs Mailing Lists Poll ...
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> > "If there was an official newsgroup for postgresql, would you switch
> > to using Usenet from using the mailing lists?"
> > As a side note, for those that do vote 'yes', please note that there
> > is an official pgsql.* hierarchy gated from the mailing lists, that is
> > available at news.postgresql.org, if you do wish to use a news reader
> > vs a mail reader ...
> FWIW, I voted yes, but my vote depended upon it being a
> comp.databases.postgresql.* hierarchy, done according to USENET
> guidelines. I sense that would be a lot more important for PostgreSQL
> in the long term and a lot more sustainable in general than a pgsql.*
> hierarchy. It's been my experience that processes done outside the norm
> tend to have extra problems along the way that cost more than the
> immediate gratification is worth, even if it does seem more painful at
> the time.
> My $0.02.
me too. Funny how the YES vote got interpreted for us.
In response to
pgsql-announce by date
|Next:||From: Murray Cumming||Date: 2004-11-30 18:49:48|
|Subject: ANNOUNCE: Glom 0.8.9|
|Previous:||From: Marc||Date: 2004-11-30 15:52:35|
|Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] USENET vs Mailing Lists Poll ...|
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-11-30 16:21:16|
|Subject: Re: Error handling in plperl and pltcl |
|Previous:||From: Greg Stark||Date: 2004-11-30 16:09:15|
|Subject: Re: multiline CSV fields|
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Mage||Date: 2004-11-30 16:19:47|
|Subject: Re: change natural column order|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-11-30 16:08:59|
|Subject: Re: change natural column order |