Re: Non-superuser subscription owners

From: Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Non-superuser subscription owners
Date: 2023-01-18 20:58:26
Message-ID: CC6768B1-5484-4472-BF53-03766351A722@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Jan 18, 2023, at 12:51 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Unless I'm missing something, it seems like this could be a quite small patch.

I didn't like the idea of the create/alter subscription commands needing to parse the connection string and think about what it might do, because at some point in the future we might extend what things are allowed in that string, and we have to keep everything that contemplates that string in sync. I may have been overly hesitant to tackle that problem. Or maybe I just ran short of round tuits.


Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2023-01-18 21:02:15 Re: Decoupling antiwraparound autovacuum from special rules around auto cancellation
Previous Message Robert Haas 2023-01-18 20:51:08 Re: Non-superuser subscription owners