| From: | decibel <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings |
| Date: | 2009-09-28 22:52:18 |
| Message-ID: | CC66F887-4067-4745-97B5-48F7E2B168AC@decibel.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sep 27, 2009, at 9:19 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> What we seem to be lacking in this case is a good tech-speak
> option for the underlying catalog name. I'm still not happy
> with having a catalog and a view that are exactly the same
> except for "s", especially since as Alvaro notes that won't
> lead to desirable tab-completion behavior. OTOH, we have
> survived with pg_index vs pg_indexes, so maybe it wouldn't
> kill us.
Another option is to revisit the set of system views (http://
pgfoundry.org/projects/newsysviews/) IIRC there was some other
recent reason we wanted to do that.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-09-28 22:52:56 | Re: Rejecting weak passwords |
| Previous Message | Bernd Helmle | 2009-09-28 22:33:03 | Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings |