Re: Image storage questions

From: "Guy Rouillier" <guyr(at)masergy(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Image storage questions
Date: 2005-05-19 23:21:13
Message-ID: CC1CF380F4D70844B01D45982E671B239E887A@mtxexch01.add0.masergy.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> External storing is useful but I prefer LO because all my data (binary
> and meta) is all in the same place for management.

But if that's a big L in LO, performance and maintenance will be
negatively affected, perhaps significantly. The DBMS will have to scan
over all that large binary data to extract text or numeric data. And
backups will copy that static binary data repeatedly. For those
reasons, if I'm storing very large objects, like images, that I know
I'll never search or update, I prefer to manage them externally.

--
Guy Rouillier

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Douglas McNaught 2005-05-19 23:45:13 Re: Image storage questions
Previous Message Brent Wood 2005-05-19 23:17:37 Re: bulk loader