Re: do I need replication or something else?

From: "Guy Rouillier" <guyr(at)masergy(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: do I need replication or something else?
Date: 2005-03-29 20:11:26
Message-ID: CC1CF380F4D70844B01D45982E671B2348E76D@mtxexch01.add0.masergy.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Dann Corbit wrote:

> If it were me, and someone proposed a model where two-way replication
> was needed, I would tell them to rethink their model. It's broken.

I'm relatively new to PostgreSQL so won't comment about that. But some
DBMSs have this feature built in because it is a fairly common usage
model (think traveling salespeople.) I've personally used Watcom (now
Sybase) SQL Anywhere which has this and it works quite well. I would
respectfully disagree that the requirement for two-way replication
indicates a broken design.

--
Guy Rouillier

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Burger 2005-03-29 21:00:37 Re: do I need replication or something else?
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2005-03-29 20:04:23 Re: 8.0.1 in a non-standard location and tsearch2