| From: | Rob Napier <rob(at)doitonce(dot)net(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Slogans for 9.2 |
| Date: | 2012-02-24 20:07:26 |
| Message-ID: | CB6E2B1E.7EA9%rob@doitonce.net.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 25/02/12 10:18 AM, "Darren Duncan" <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net> wrote:
> So a train is a better image.
>
> I suggest a modern train, but probably not a bullet train, as we want to
> suggest
> fast, but not so fast that we're taking greater risks.
>
> -- Darren Duncan
I agree Darren.
To me, the current choice of engine gives out all the wrong messages.
How about the Flying Scotsman, if licensing is not a problem? It was
innovative, sleek, fast, powerful, glamorous/stylish.
Regards
Rob Napier
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2012-02-24 23:42:49 | Postgres code quality |
| Previous Message | Hossein Zolfi | 2012-02-24 18:15:55 | Postgresql in market |