Re: Improve search for missing parent downlinks in amcheck

From: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improve search for missing parent downlinks in amcheck
Date: 2020-01-23 02:41:37
Message-ID: CAPpHfdvxWsN6soKkapbfwFa4k9fjL7Tcyj66xKGaXwzBN3=SaA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 1:05 AM Tomas Vondra
<tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 03:03:01PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 01:15:19AM +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> >> The revised patch seems to fix all of above.
> >
> >The latest patch is failing to apply. Please provide a rebase.
>
> This still does not apply (per cputube). Can you provide a fixed patch?

Rebased patch is attached. Sorry for so huge delay.

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
amcheck-btree-improve-missing-parent-downlinks-check-4.patch application/octet-stream 23.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Dilger 2020-01-23 03:00:35 Re: making the backend's json parser work in frontend code
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2020-01-23 00:30:10 Re: Index Skip Scan