| From: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | zengman <zengman(at)halodbtech(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stéphane Tachoires <stephane(dot)tachoires(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Koval <d(dot)koval(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Add SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS commands |
| Date: | 2025-12-14 13:47:34 |
| Message-ID: | CAPpHfdvt64X0F3thjC0q9vOTU-JqG2M_MJfEeA2-_=odNOA3Dg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Man,
On Sun, Dec 14, 2025 at 2:51 PM zengman <zengman(at)halodbtech(dot)com> wrote:
> I just noticed two relatively large commits. I recall that not long ago we started attempting to adopt `palloc_object` and `palloc_array` in many places,
> yet in these two commits, some sections have used the new approach while others have not.
> Perhaps we could standardize the coding style for consistency.
>
> src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c
> src/backend/partitioning/partbounds.c
Could you, please, check the attached patch?
------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v1-0001-Fix-usage-of-palloc-in-MERGE-SPLIT-PARTITION-s-co.patch | application/octet-stream | 3.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2025-12-14 13:48:57 | Re: Proposal to allow setting cursor options on Portals |
| Previous Message | Jelte Fennema-Nio | 2025-12-14 13:41:53 | Re: Proposal to allow setting cursor options on Portals |