Re: [PATCH] Opclass parameters

From: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan(at)nataraj(dot)su>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Opclass parameters
Date: 2020-03-31 09:15:31
Message-ID: CAPpHfdvqdSbW0=JiiykkezuF_HYs9=iJMpHsNfUOJe6yXHQfGA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 5:44 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 06:05:51PM +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 3:28 AM Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> > > Attached new version of reordered patches.
> >
> > I'm going to push this if no objections.
>
> Find attached patch with editorial corrections to docs for this commit.

Cool, thank you!

> [-signature. Optional-]{+signature XXX. Its optional+} integer parameter <literal>siglen</literal>[-of-]

What is XXX supposed to be?

The rest of patch looks good to me.

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2020-03-31 09:21:23 Re: WAL usage calculation patch
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2020-03-31 09:09:04 Re: WAL usage calculation patch