| From: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SQL/JSON json_table plan clause |
| Date: | 2026-05-11 12:42:33 |
| Message-ID: | CAPpHfdvnacwjFGhqit7gE2RevJ8TEHM3bqZjMxb=fJ7P6ZNvKw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, Nikita!
On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 6:30 PM Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I've rebased patch set onto current master and have corrected
> output according to recent changes in JSON array processing.
> Awaiting review.
Thank you for your efforts in this direction. I've reviewed the v22 of
the patch, and I have the following notes.
1. IsA(planstate, JsonTableSiblingJoin) is wrong. planstate is not a
node, thus IsA() can't be applied to it. You should instead do
IsA(planstate->plan, JsonTableSiblingJoin). It wasn't catched,
because regression tests don't exercise this branch. So, you also
need to improve the coverage.
2. get_json_table() with patch uses JSON_BEHAVIOR_EMPTY as the default
value for deparsing, while parsing still uses
JSON_BEHAVIOR_EMPTY_ARRAY. Looks plain wrong. I'm not sure what is
intention here.
3. PLAN clause is always emitted during deparsing even if user didn't
specify anything. I would prefer to skip PLAN clause in this case
unless there is strong reason to do the opposite (this reason must be
pointed if any).
4. Unused typedefs in src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list:
JsonTableScanState, JsonPathSpec, JsonTablePlanStateType,
JsonTableJoinState.
5. Empty comment in JsonTablePlanState definition. Pointed by Amit,
but not fixed.
6. Rename passingArgs to passing_Args for no reason in parse_jsontable.c.
7. Patch lacks documentation (also pointed by Amit)
8. Patch could use pgindent run.
------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | cca5507 | 2026-05-11 13:19:33 | Re: Question about hashed ScalarArrayOpExpr equality semantics |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2026-05-11 12:10:09 | Re: Random pg_upgrade 004_subscription test failure on drongo |