Re: Ordering in guc.c vs. config.sgml vs. postgresql.sample.conf

From: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Ordering in guc.c vs. config.sgml vs. postgresql.sample.conf
Date: 2016-04-25 12:18:01
Message-ID: CAPpHfdvMXKL84CaFxJE9o4CeZAFQiPeaF5Di0G8m8U7FRCMScA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

> While working on
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CABUevEzwMa9y+Bp4Fi4fE4hmPfZMjOZOmuLVtbHhPWtcujrmLg@mail.gmail.com
> I once more taken aback by the total lack of consistency between the
> three files in $subject. Some of the inconsistency of guc.c vs. the rest
> comes from having separate lists for different datatypes - hard to avoid
> - but even disregarding that, there seems to be little to no
> consistency.
>
> How about we try to order them the same? That's obviously not a 9.6
> topic at this point, but it'd probably be good to that early in 9.7.
>

+1

Also, what do you think about validation script which checks consistency
between them?

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Geoff Winkless 2016-04-25 12:18:20 Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2016-04-25 11:22:32 Re: pg_dump / copy bugs with "big lines" ?