Re: WAIT FOR command should do some query jumbling

From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sami Imseih <samimseih(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, sirisha chamarthi <sirichamarthi22(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Korotkov <akorotkov(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WAIT FOR command should do some query jumbling
Date: 2026-09-02 12:53:20
Message-ID: CAPpHfdvKQ=dynSFp+nmMG8MvgvMDt7M2YTfEKhd7GsAhGTtFaA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 2, 2026 at 8:16 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 11:28:13AM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> > Yeah, after staring at this some more, v1 seems reasonable to proceed with
> > for v19 from an RMT perspective. I've alerted Melanie and Heikki in case
> > they want to share opinions, too.
>
> Hearing nothing, I have expanded the tests in v1 with more option
> patterns, and applied it down to v19.

I was about to deal with this issue. Thank you for pushing v1,
I'll take a look at v2 for v20.

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2026-09-02 13:00:01 Re: gist_trgm_ops '=' operator: planner picks it over btree, ~300x slower
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2026-09-02 12:50:51 Re: Function scan FDW pushdown