Re: Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)?

From: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Ryan Murphy <ryanfmurphy(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)?
Date: 2018-03-01 22:56:00
Message-ID: CAPpHfdvDs-sLtkh77zU8O2mpg5139YBcdG1iurT8psD1dndn6A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 1:51 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

> On 2018-03-02 01:48:03 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> > Also, the last commitfest is already too late for such big changes.
> > So, I'm marking this RWF.
>
> Agreed. Perhaps extract the 64bit GUC patch and track that separately?
> Seems like something we should just do...
>

Sounds reasonable. But I didn't notice if there are other users for 64bit
GUCs
besides 64bit xids?

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Euler Taveira 2018-03-01 23:00:37 Re: row filtering for logical replication
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-03-01 22:51:49 Re: Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)?