Re: Implement waiting for wal lsn replay: reloaded

From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: Implement waiting for wal lsn replay: reloaded
Date: 2025-11-16 15:20:25
Message-ID: CAPpHfduVuqQ1vXWW6=-sv6-GNuZP21w0dVKvMrTYoXm6GBdn4Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Nov 16, 2025 at 3:25 PM Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2025 at 6:29 PM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Thank you so much for your patches!
> > Pushed with minor corrections.
>
> Thanks for pushing! It appears I should be running pgindent more regularly :).

Thank you. pgindent is not a problem for me, cause I anyway run it
every time before pushing a patch. But yes, if you make it a habit to
run pgindent every time before publishing a patch, it would become
cleaner.

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 河田達也 2025-11-16 16:01:03 [PATCH] Add memory usage reporting to VACUUM VERBOSE
Previous Message Xuneng Zhou 2025-11-16 14:01:04 Re: Implement waiting for wal lsn replay: reloaded