| From: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Table AM Interface Enhancements |
| Date: | 2024-03-19 15:28:41 |
| Message-ID: | CAPpHfduSX=7sEP7yp_ecsjaBDogXfHgXZ75Mg802r9XoJLxJLQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 4:26 PM Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 at 21:05, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Regarding 0005, I did apply "a storage tuples" grammar fix. Regarding
> > the rest of the things, I'd like to keep methods
> > tts_*_is_current_xact_tuple() to be similar to nearby
> > tts_*_getsysattr(). This is why I'm keeping the rest unchanged. I
> > think we could refactor that later, but together with
> > tts_*_getsysattr() methods.
> >
> > I'm going to push 0003, 0004 and 0005 if there are no objections.
> >
> > And I'll update 0001 and 0002 in their dedicated thread.
> >
>
> When I try to test the patch on Ubuntu 22.04 with GCC 11.4.0. There are some
> warnings as following:
Thank you for catching this!
Please, find the revised patchset attached.
------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jelte Fennema-Nio | 2024-03-19 15:36:43 | Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` |
| Previous Message | vignesh C | 2024-03-19 15:24:19 | Re: speed up a logical replica setup |