Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT?

From: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT?
Date: 2016-08-19 14:54:19
Message-ID: CAPpHfdu1JZDRffLpU1DoqVKJ6YUEjjS6cgt47B9K2pP1cHo7Rw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Alexander Korotkov
> <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> > Hackers,
> >
> > originally this idea was proposed by Andres Freund while experimenting
> with
> > lockfree Pin/UnpinBuffer [1].
> > The patch is attached as well as results of pgbench -S on 72-cores
> machine.
> > As before it shows huge benefit in this case.
> > For sure, we should validate that it doesn't cause performance
> regression in
> > other cases. At least we should test read-write and smaller machines.
> > Any other ideas?
> >
>
> may be test on Power m/c as well.
>

Good idea. I don't have any such machine at hand now. Do you have one?

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-08-19 14:56:20 Make better use of existing enums in plpgsql
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2016-08-19 14:50:03 Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT?