Re: Improve search for missing parent downlinks in amcheck

From: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improve search for missing parent downlinks in amcheck
Date: 2020-03-11 09:01:59
Message-ID: CAPpHfdtwXqkvk+PE699cCqbOmSn4ps+TRO29VEhoWzd-sBZFWg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 7:19 AM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> This looks committable. I only noticed one thing: The comments above
> bt_target_page_check() need to be updated to reflect the new check,
> which no longer has anything to do with "heapallindexed = true".

Thank you! Pushed with this comment revised!

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2020-03-11 09:06:23 Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager
Previous Message Richard Guo 2020-03-11 08:59:26 Re: Optimizer Doesn't Push Down Where Expressions on Rollups