| From: | Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CUBE seems a bit confused about ORDER BY |
| Date: | 2018-01-10 15:17:20 |
| Message-ID: | CAPpHfdthSHtwkZf1hE909yb1tk-jPMrUbw=5kKaSLYtM8NYvww@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> wrote:
> SQL-query seems too huge for release notes and isn't looking for
> materialized view (fixable) and functional indexes with function which
> contains this operator somewhere inside (not fixable by this query). I
> think, just words is enough.
I found that cube_2.out expected output in regression tests is used on
Windows 2003 in my virtual machine. I've checked that for both cube
patches, regression tests pass correctly on that virtual machine.
------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-01-10 15:37:07 | Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table |
| Previous Message | Konstantin Knizhnik | 2018-01-10 15:07:38 | Re: [HACKERS] Secondary index access optimizations |