Re: Reject WAIT FOR earlier in transaction-snapshot mode

From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Sami Imseih <samimseih(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou(at)gmail(dot)com>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reject WAIT FOR earlier in transaction-snapshot mode
Date: 2026-09-18 06:48:13
Message-ID: CAPpHfdtUxnD87ER65q8ZLwYbT6=C77J=cn8mxja2b+gZJM7RPA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 2:40 AM Sami Imseih <samimseih(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> "and which other standby modes can end up waiting for too."
>
> This works for me. I have no other comments.

Thank you, pushed.

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2026-09-18 07:00:13 SHMEM_ATTACH_UNKNOWN_SIZE reaches InitShmemIndexEntry()
Previous Message Ajin Cherian 2026-09-18 06:43:20 Re: table-write trigger can bypass ATPrepChangePersistence