From: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Artur Zakirov <zaartur(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Subject: | Re: type cache cleanup improvements |
Date: | 2025-04-11 21:43:19 |
Message-ID: | CAPpHfdtRvDtoVCN0fMVCUDong2eX-o4ATKJCQ9F0epPmm83rZA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 11:32 PM Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 08:33:24PM +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 6:10 PM Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 at 11:34, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >> I'm going to push this if no objections.
>
> (This became commit b85a9d0.)
>
> > + /* Call delete_rel_type_cache() if we actually cleared something */
> > + if (hadTupDescOrOpclass)
> > + delete_rel_type_cache_if_needed(typentry);
>
> I think the intent was to maintain the invariant that a RelIdToTypeIdCacheHash
> entry exists if and only if certain kinds of data appear in the TypeCacheHash
> entry. However, TypeCacheOpcCallback() clears TCFLAGS_OPERATOR_FLAGS without
> maintaining RelIdToTypeIdCacheHash. Is it right to do that?
Thank you for the question. I'll recheck this in next couple of days.
------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2025-04-11 22:03:59 | Re: n_ins_since_vacuum stats for aborted transactions |
Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2025-04-11 21:42:26 | Re: MergeJoin beats HashJoin in the case of multiple hash clauses |