From: | Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Ildus Kurbangaliev <i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Waits monitoring |
Date: | 2015-09-09 11:21:51 |
Message-ID: | CAPpHfdtOosBfjAoqv7OQnd0xODKGsqj+XnPJdwi+TFgddnyOGw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Ildus Kurbangaliev
> <i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> >> > Ildus, could you please review Amit & Robert's patch?
> >> [1] -
> >>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1KdeC1Tm5ya9gkV85Vtn4qqsRxzKJrU-tu70G_tL1xkFA@mail.gmail.com
> > About [1] and [2]. They are slightly conflicting, but if [1] is
> > going to be committed I can easily use it in [2]. And it will simplify
> > my patch, so I have no objections here. And the same time [3] can be
> > significantly simplified and improved on top of [1] and [2].
>
> Great - let's try to deal with [1] first, then.
>
> Does anyone wish to object to me committing that part?
>
No objections from me.
------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nikolay Shaplov | 2015-09-09 11:39:52 | Re: pageinspect patch, for showing tuple data |
Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2015-09-09 10:13:11 | Re: Use pg_rewind when target timeline was switched |