Re: Waits monitoring

From: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ildus Kurbangaliev <i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Waits monitoring
Date: 2015-09-09 11:21:51
Message-ID: CAPpHfdtOosBfjAoqv7OQnd0xODKGsqj+XnPJdwi+TFgddnyOGw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Ildus Kurbangaliev
> <i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> >> > Ildus, could you please review Amit & Robert's patch?
> >> [1] -
> >>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1KdeC1Tm5ya9gkV85Vtn4qqsRxzKJrU-tu70G_tL1xkFA@mail.gmail.com
> > About [1] and [2]. They are slightly conflicting, but if [1] is
> > going to be committed I can easily use it in [2]. And it will simplify
> > my patch, so I have no objections here. And the same time [3] can be
> > significantly simplified and improved on top of [1] and [2].
>
> Great - let's try to deal with [1] first, then.
>
> Does anyone wish to object to me committing that part?
>

No objections from me.

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nikolay Shaplov 2015-09-09 11:39:52 Re: pageinspect patch, for showing tuple data
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2015-09-09 10:13:11 Re: Use pg_rewind when target timeline was switched