Re: pg_atomic_exchange_u32() in ProcArrayGroupClearXid()

From: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_atomic_exchange_u32() in ProcArrayGroupClearXid()
Date: 2018-09-22 13:28:21
Message-ID: CAPpHfdtJ_tYwKiZBQYnwK31nogvXyWzbhAtDpSz586P3vCDN1Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 9:55 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 11:06 PM Alexander Korotkov
> <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> > While investigating ProcArrayGroupClearXid() code I wonder why do we
> have this loop instead of plain pg_atomic_exchange_u32() call?
>
> We can use pg_atomic_exchange_u32 instead of a loop. In fact, clog
> code uses pg_atomic_exchange_u32 for the same purpose. I think it is
> better to make the code consistent at both places. Feel free to
> change it, otherwise, I can take care of it in a few days time.
>

Thank you for feedback. Pushed.

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-09-22 16:09:40 Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for larger connection counts
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2018-09-22 13:23:23 Re: New function pg_stat_statements_reset_query() to reset statistics of a specific query