Re: Psql patch to show access methods info

From: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Subject: Re: Psql patch to show access methods info
Date: 2019-09-14 08:14:59
Message-ID: CAPpHfdtGtRt2NLGGDCCSZ3dAnibgx8PjVgaZhGGJ49O9LMuR7g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 10:39 AM Alexander Korotkov
<a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 12:36 AM Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > On 2019-Aug-06, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> >
> > > Revised patch is attached. Changes to \dA+ command are reverted. It
> > > also contains some minor improvements.
> > >
> > > Second patch looks problematic for me, because it provides index
> > > description alternative to \d+. IMHO, if there is something really
> > > useful to display about index, we should keep it in \d+. So, I
> > > propose to postpone this.
> >
> > Are you saying that we should mark this entire CF entry as Returned with
> > Feedback? Or do you see a subset of your latest 0001 as a commitable
> > patch?
>
> Still hope to commit 0001. Please, don't mark RFC for now.

Sorry, I meant don't mark it RWF for now :)

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2019-09-14 08:24:10 Re: refactoring - share str2*int64 functions
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2019-09-14 07:39:55 Re: Psql patch to show access methods info