Re: Double sorting split patch

From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Double sorting split patch
Date: 2011-09-22 19:12:52
Message-ID: CAPpHfdt6MO0Q9JgVXvYuf1Oe_ge_CqjCQ+ynAvYM-zEfVcEQiw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <
> heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> 'lower' and 'upper' are not used for anything in the above. Is that just
>>> dead code that can be removed, or is there something missing that should be
>>> using them?
>>
>> Yes, it's just dead code.
>
Patch without that dead code is attached.

------
With best regards,
Alexander Korotkov.

Attachment Content-Type Size
double-sorting-split-0.3.patch.gz application/x-gzip 6.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2011-09-22 21:10:26 Re: patch: plpgsql - remove unnecessary ccache search when a array variable is updated
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-09-22 19:01:56 Re: citext operator precedence fix