| From: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | zengman <zengman(at)halodbtech(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stéphane Tachoires <stephane(dot)tachoires(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Koval <d(dot)koval(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Add SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS commands |
| Date: | 2025-12-14 13:33:45 |
| Message-ID: | CAPpHfdt6LvmU_ekw5gyHnsfRaVV0j4s9UPMVWE=V7ViG3YyChQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Man,
On Sun, Dec 14, 2025 at 2:51 PM zengman <zengman(at)halodbtech(dot)com> wrote:
> I just noticed two relatively large commits. I recall that not long ago we started attempting to adopt `palloc_object` and `palloc_array` in many places,
> yet in these two commits, some sections have used the new approach while others have not.
> Perhaps we could standardize the coding style for consistency.
>
> src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c
> src/backend/partitioning/partbounds.c
Thank you for noticing this. I'm going to prepare patches to adopt
`palloc_object` and `palloc_array` in my recent commits right away.
------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jelte Fennema-Nio | 2025-12-14 13:41:53 | Re: Proposal to allow setting cursor options on Portals |
| Previous Message | cca5507 | 2025-12-14 13:33:00 | [PATCH] Add pg_lfind8_nonzero() |