Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches

From: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ildus Kurbangaliev <i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "andres(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches
Date: 2016-01-29 11:59:49
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>

> So far as I can tell, there are three patches in flight here:
> * replication slot IO lwlocks
> * ability of extensions to request tranches dynamically
> The first one hasn't been reviewed at all, but the other two have seen a
> bit of discussion and evolution. Is anyone doing any more reviewing?

I'd like to add another one: fixed tranche id for each SLRU.
And I'm going to make review over others.

Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional:
The Russian Postgres Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
slru_tranche_ids_v1.patch application/octet-stream 8.2 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-01-29 12:00:37 Re: Sequence Access Method WIP
Previous Message Mithun Cy 2016-01-29 11:41:32 Re: Using quicksort for every external sort run